http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/cache-size Beta Testers Forum en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:38:52 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/does-sombody-know-the-maximum-of-ram-cache-which-eboostr-can-handle#post-993 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:50:57 +0000 carloblanco 993@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Somebody have an answer for this : with XP SP3 and 8192 MB RAM on board, what's the maximum RAM quantity I can use for cache ? </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/cache-exclusions#post-134 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 21:22:11 +0000 chooky 134@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I am using a 2GB RAM cache. I have found that I need to exclude a lot of programs and folders that really don't require cacheing such as uninstall programs, utilities, benchmarks and windows update files. This allows more of the programs I want to be faster to be cached. May I suggest eBoostr installs with a default exclusion list. This would give users who don't tweak a better experience.</p> <p>Here is what I have excluded so far:<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\APPTIMER<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\CCLEANER<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\EBOOSTR\LANG<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\ELECTRONIC ARTS\CRYTEK<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\IOBIT<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\TWEAKNOW POWERPACK 2009<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\OZONE3D<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES\FRAPS<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES\PERFORMANCETEST<br /> D:\<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\NVIDIA CORPORATION\NVIDIA PHYSX\DEMOS<br /> uninstall.EXE<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\FUTUREMARK\<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\BLUESCREENVIEW<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\COMMON FILES\FUTUREMARK SHARED\FUTUREMARK SYSTEMINFO<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\COMODO\COMODO SYSTEM CLEANER<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\DISKCHECKUP<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\DISKTRIX\ULTIMATEDEFRAG2008<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\DRIVER SWEEPER<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\FILEHIPPO.COM<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\GEEKBENCH 2.1<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\GIGABYTE\GAMER HUD LITE<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\LAVALYS\EVEREST ULTIMATE EDITION<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\NOVICORP_WINTOFLASH_0.4.0013_BETA<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\OCCT<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\SOFTMCCS<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES\AS SSD BENCHMARK<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES\CORETEMP64<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES\CRYSTALDISKMARK<br /> *.PNG<br /> *.PT<br /> C:\WINDOWS\DOWNLOADED PROGRAM FILES<br /> C:\WINDOWS\INSTALLER\{12803180-9CAD-11DE-B804-005056806466}<br /> C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CATROOT2<br /> C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\CATROOT<br /> C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\LOGFILES\SCM<br /> C:\WINDOWS\SYSTEM32\WINEVT\LOGS<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES\MICROSOFT GAMES<br /> C:\USERS\DAVID\APPDATA\LOCAL\MICROSOFT\FEEDS CACHE<br /> C:\USERS\DAVID\APPDATA\LOCAL\MICROSOFT\WINDOWS MAIL<br /> C:\USERS\DAVID\APPDATA\ROAMING\MICROSOFT\INSTALLER<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\MICROSOFT WINDOWS 7 UPGRADE ADVISOR<br /> C:\PROGRAM FILES (X86)\MONINFO</p> <p>This adds up to quite a fee MB of cache space that is now being used by files I do use all the time.</p> <p>Are there other system files I don't need that people are excluding? </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-have-no-sense-to-use-more-than-16gb-of-hard-disk#post-21 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 18:47:41 +0000 Zeioth 21@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I&#39;d like to know what is the reason why performance decreases when you use more than this amount. This doesn&#39;t happend with pendrives or RAM (where you just need keep free more than 1gb for system). Is because hard disk need more time to locate archives? Thanks for your answers, i&#39;m just curious. </p>