eBoostr Beta Program Forum » Tag: performance

eBoostr Beta Program Forum » Tag: performance - Recent Topics http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/performance Beta Testers Forum en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:51:46 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 <![CDATA[Search]]> q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php ruanqizhen on "I just tried it on my Thinkpad T400" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/i-just-tried-it-on-my-thinkpad-t400#post-1390 Thu, 23 Dec 2010 08:15:39 +0000 ruanqizhen 1390@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ The OS is Windows7 64bit I create the cache on my 2G Intel Turbo Memory It takes 50 seconds to start up before using eBoostr. And 40 seconds after using eBoostr. The data is an approximate one. Why don't eBoostr provides a tool to count the start time? Zeioth on "Low performance RAM Cache" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/low-performance-ram-cache#post-270 Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:47:16 +0000 Zeioth 270@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ My Ram is DDR3 1600 model corsair cl9 dhx, and my problem is that eboostr 3/4.0(536) show a 1.4 ration when ram memory should be arround ratio 4, (i seen screenshots). even my hard disk have better ratio (1.7) i'm not sure what's wrong, may be this ram model have problems in eboostr? thanks for your ideas/comments. <img src="http://i34.tinypic.com/10iigee.jpg"> zPedro on "Superfetch" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/superfetch#post-1029 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:19:08 +0000 zPedro 1029@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ Did anybody try to disable superfetch? If so what were the results? Do you think it's advisable? lukechoi on "how to measure performance boost up?" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/how-to-measure-performance-boost-up#post-734 Fri, 06 Nov 2009 04:31:06 +0000 lukechoi 734@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ I am curious that how we can measure eboostr performance boost up result? booting time? Application loading time? How we can set up test environment to get maximum boost up preformance result??? welcome for any idea on this.... Zeioth on "Focus on ram performance & compatibility" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/focus-on-ram-performance-compatibility#post-584 Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:50:41 +0000 Zeioth 584@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ DDR3 1600 in my PC reach 100 mb/s while people with ddr2 can reach 400 mb/s in cache speed. This may be a compatibility problem. More info: <a href="http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/low-performance-ram-cache#post-583" rel="nofollow">http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/low-performance-ram-cache#post-583</a> If someone more have the same problem can post it here. PhilP on "Speed Measure Tool - Only 1.18 ratio" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/speed-measure-tool-only-118-ratio#post-321 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:32:57 +0000 PhilP 321@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ Hello! I tried the Speed Measure Tool with Opera and let it run 5 times. Background programs were closed and Antivirus deactivated. The ration is just 1.18. Shouldn't it be more? I have Win 7 Ultimate 32 Bit with 4 GB installed. <a href="'http://imgur.com/KJLEK.png'"><img src="http://imgur.com/KJLEK.png"></a> Thanks & kind regards chooky on "Post up your results!" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/post-up-your-results#post-333 Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:30:16 +0000 chooky 333@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ I thought it might be interesting and informative to make a little database to show what sort of results people are getting. Please include as much relevant detail as you can. Include cache size and media, eBoostr version, OS, installed memory, CPU and speed,Storage details, readyboost or superfetch enabled/disabled. Copy this template into your post and fill in the details. eBoostr version: OS: CPU: PC RAM: C: Drive: eBoostr cache: Readyboost: Superfetch: Speed check: If you have the test result window selected you can press CTRL+C to copy the details and CTRL+V or paste to copy them into your post. Here are my results: eBoostr version: 536 OS: Win 7 RTM x64 CPU: Q9550@4951 PC RAM: 4GB C: Drive: 2 x 30GB Vertex RAID 0 eBoostr cache: 2000MB RAM Readyboost: none Superfetch: disabled Speed check: --------------------------- eBoostr : Control Panel --------------------------- Direct access speed: 222.955109 MB/s Cache enabled access speed: 1003.847107 MB/s Ratio: 4.502463 MS Excel 2007 --------------------------- eBoostr Speed Check --------------------------- Total direct access time: 2.56 sec Total cached access time: 0.31 sec Cache hits 96% Ratio: 8.19 --------------------------- MS Word 2007 --------------------------- eBoostr Speed Check --------------------------- Total direct access time: 5.56 sec Total cached access time: 3.58 sec Cache hits 97% Ratio: 1.56 Internet Explorer 8 Blank Homepage --------------------------- eBoostr Speed Check --------------------------- Total direct access time: 4.84 sec Total cached access time: 4.06 sec Cache hits 69% Ratio: 1.19 Google Chrome 4.0.213.1 <a href="http://www.google.com.au/" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com.au/</a> homepage --------------------------- eBoostr Speed Check --------------------------- Total direct access time: 1.81 sec Total cached access time: 0.25 sec Cache hits 84% Ratio: 7.28 Google Earth 5.1.3509.4636 --------------------------- eBoostr Speed Check --------------------------- Total direct access time: 6.11 sec Total cached access time: 4.69 sec Cache hits 64% Ratio: 1.30 --------------------------- OK --------------------------- saiarcot895 on "Build 535 faster than Build 529, but still bit under speed of v3 for me" http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/build-535-faster-than-build-529-but-still-bit-under-speed-of-v3-for-me#post-130 Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:02:09 +0000 saiarcot895 130@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ On Build 529, the direct access speed was 13-15 MB and the cache-enabled access speed was around 200-220 MB. Now the cache-enabled access speed is 260-270 MB, but it is still a bit less than the 300 MB speed in v3.