http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/priority Beta Testers Forum en-US Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:31:54 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/priorisation-of-caches#post-996 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 17:51:29 +0000 mradr 996@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Prioritizing is controled by the random speed a deivce can go. Also, eboostr only uses 4 devices at anyone time. Far as I know, it works with the safe remove function for deivces that can be unplug like a usb. Usally hard drives are internal not external, so it could be just that the programmers haven't gotton that far or been ask to redo the code to allow external hard drives to be encrypted. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/priorisation-of-caches#post-974 Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:47:16 +0000 Yeti 974@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Id would be a great improvement if eboostr could prioritize witch caches to use, if there are many aviable. there should be no limitation of maximum supported caches or it should be so high, that everything is possible. I have 6 caches, but eboostr is using only 4 of them in an unpractical way: all hard disks, some usb, but no ram. I´ve had to exclude two drives and put them to vista ready boost. This is the only way I´ve got my ram cache to work. eboostr should use always the best cache. Does eboostr internally decide according to drive type where what type of data goes or are all devices handled equally? Does eboostr react to the safe remove function of windows? Why couldn´t the cache on External USB hard drives be encrypted? </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/applications-priority#post-369 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:26:04 +0000 Art 369@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, the file "application.ini" (with priority applications list) has a number at the beginning of each line, usually 1000. I would like to know if this number can be adjusted? Thanks Art </p>