<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>eBoostr Beta Program Forum &#187; Tag: ram - Recent Topics</title>
		<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/ram</link>
		<description>Beta Testers Forum</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 18:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/rss/tags/ram/topics" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Zeioth on "Low performance RAM Cache"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/low-performance-ram-cache#post-270</link>
			<pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2009 21:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Zeioth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">270@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;My Ram is DDR3 1600 model corsair cl9 dhx, and my problem is that eboostr 3/4.0(536) show a 1.4 ration when ram memory should be arround ratio 4, (i seen screenshots). even my hard disk have better ratio (1.7) i'm not sure what's wrong, may be this ram model have problems in eboostr? thanks for your ideas/comments.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;img src=&#34;http://i34.tinypic.com/10iigee.jpg&#34;&#62;
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>interfasys on "Wanted: Profiles"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/wanted-profiles#post-1211</link>
			<pubDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 09:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>interfasys</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1211@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'd love to be able to have eBoostr profiles.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Let's say I have plenty of memory, so I assign a good chunk to eBoostr, but later that day I want to do some tests on an OS in Virtualbox.&#60;br /&#62;
Right now, I have to reconfigure eBoostr to use less RAM, but with profiles, I could click on a VB profile that frees RAM.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Ribeiro on "CleanMem"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/cleanmem#post-1143</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 16:56:15 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Ribeiro</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1143@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;What do you think about using CleanMem (&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.pcwintech.com/cleanmem&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://www.pcwintech.com/cleanmem&#60;/a&#62;) with eBoostr? Is it advisable or not? I have it installed but I don't know if it is a good idea as I am afraid that it shall clean eBoostr cache if using ram. I would appreciate an answer if you please. Thank you!&#60;br /&#62;
My old Windows XP laptop has 2 GB Ram and I'm using 500 MB as eBoostr memory cache.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yeti on "advanced memory cache stopped working"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/advanced-memory-cache-stopped-working-1#post-973</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 10:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Yeti</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">973@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;The Advanced memory Cache is always labeled with a yellow warning sign, but my other 4 devices are marked as working. This has nothing to do with the unmanaged ram, because even if its disabled it wont work. I´m using build 545 on a Windows Vista Home Premium 32 Bit (German) with 4 GB Ram, 3 USB Flash Drives and one external 1TB hard drive. The AV Software is Kaspersky Internet Security 9.0.0.736. The system is a HP Pavilion dv6810eg Notebook. what should i do to solve this issue? Id had worked before and I don´t want to throw away 863MB of unmanaged Ram.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Yeti on "priorisation of caches"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/priorisation-of-caches#post-974</link>
			<pubDate>Sun, 10 Jan 2010 13:47:16 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Yeti</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">974@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;Id would be a great improvement if eboostr could prioritize witch caches to use, if there are many aviable. there should be no limitation of maximum supported caches or it should be so high, that everything is possible. I have 6 caches, but eboostr is using only 4 of them in an unpractical way: all hard disks, some usb, but no ram. I´ve had to exclude two drives and put them to vista ready boost. This is the only way I´ve  got my ram cache to work. eboostr should use always the best cache. Does eboostr internally decide according to drive type where what type of data goes or are all devices handled equally? Does eboostr react to the safe remove function of windows? Why couldn´t the cache on External USB hard drives be encrypted?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Zeioth on "Focus on ram performance &#38; compatibility"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/focus-on-ram-performance-compatibility#post-584</link>
			<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 08:50:41 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Zeioth</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">584@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;DDR3 1600 in my PC reach 100 mb/s while people with ddr2 can reach 400 mb/s in cache speed. This may be a compatibility problem.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;More info: &#60;a href=&#34;http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/low-performance-ram-cache#post-583&#34; rel=&#34;nofollow&#34;&#62;http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/low-performance-ram-cache#post-583&#60;/a&#62;&#60;br /&#62;
If someone more have the same problem can post it here.
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

