http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/unmanaged-memory Beta Testers Forum en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 09:21:26 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/ram-discrepency-8184-mb-available-of-6141-mb-total#post-904 Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:37:33 +0000 Atertract 904@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Using Beta 4.0 Build 544 in XP Pro SP3.</p> <p>Installed 2x2 GB RAM, in addition to existing 2x1 GB RAM, for a total of 6141 MB (same brand, speed, timings). eBoostr reports *8184* MB available of 6141 MB total. However, it also reports 2559 MB unmanaged, which is accurate, and it seems to be using this memory without any issue (gets a 58.5 ratio). </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/does-sombody-know-the-maximum-of-ram-cache-which-eboostr-can-handle#post-993 Mon, 18 Jan 2010 12:50:57 +0000 carloblanco 993@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Somebody have an answer for this : with XP SP3 and 8192 MB RAM on board, what's the maximum RAM quantity I can use for cache ? </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/enable-use-of-hidden-system-memory-still-hates-intel-atoms#post-1081 Tue, 09 Feb 2010 23:39:21 +0000 goose 1081@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Every time I throw this switch, the app locks up, and runs both threads on the CPU at about 50%. I've let this go for hours, hoping it's just a buggy user interface and a high effort search, but alas . . .</p> <p>This is a Toshiba NB205, which is to say an Atom N280, and 2Gb of 667mHz memory. I have 338mb allocated form main memory, and all 8Gb of a Lexar 8Gb Professional SDHC( <a href="http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sdhc-memory-card,2143-3.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/sdhc-memory-card,2143-3.html</a> ), reformatted into FAT32 as recommended in the app.</p> <p>(Direct access speed: 11.247554 Mb/s<br /> Cache enabled access speed: 21.476002 Mb/s<br /> Ratio: 1.909393) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/hibernation-support#post-764 Mon, 09 Nov 2009 08:41:14 +0000 Bio 764@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Does beta 4 support hibernation when using "hidden memory" above 3.5 GB on 32-bit OSes???</p> <p>32-bit windows restore only "visible" part of memory, so cache must be saved to disk before hibernating or just flushed. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/version-4-computer-freezes#post-171 Thu, 17 Sep 2009 01:58:45 +0000 CAPTAHA 171@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Just upgraded from Version 3.0 to Version 4.0 (build 535) on a Dell Precision T3400 running Vista Business 32 bit. Clicking on "yes" to add the memory beyond 3.5 GB caused the computer to freeze. Had to turn it off by the power button. This happened twice. So will give up on this feature until I hear a resolution. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/suggestion-for-assigning-physical-drive-letter#post-709 Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:41:52 +0000 xevius 709@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I am using 6G of ram with windows7 x86 retail version which means I have 2.8G of unmanaged memory that can be used as cache memory. Having 2.8G of system cache memory is really nice but I want more. I'd like to use some area of this unused memory for caching temporary internet files for web browing. Therefore I installed superspeed ramdisk 10 for create physical drive from ramdisk and assigned 800mb of space for temporary internet files and rest of 2G space for eboostr cache. Overall system performance seems even but the speed of web surfing is distinctively faster than using eboostr alone. If eboostr can have physical drive letter and can caching temporary internet files, performance that users would feel will be enormously improved. Moreover, if eboostr can pull internet cache files from all other kinds of webbrowser such as firefox and google chrome which are not using temporary internet files of internet explorer, it would be even nicer. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-interfere-in-initialize-of-ramdisk-which-also-uses-unmanaged-memory#post-351 Fri, 02 Oct 2009 20:34:36 +0000 Asayu 351@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>When we use Ramdisk and eboostr at the same time, initialize of Ramdisk faild.<br /> (Ramdrive will be created,but it indicates "You need to make this drive formatted")</p> <p>it occurs when both eBoostr and Ramdisk uses ummanaged memory. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-27 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:22:53 +0000 mradr 27@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Windows 64 bit vista, 4 GB of ram, no USB device. When you first install eboostr 4.0 build 529, it sees its your frist time and ask if you want to set up the devices, say yes. After witch the screen will come up, and the &quot;Enable use of hidden system memory&quot; will be uncheck/checkable. Check it and then it will thow a error at you saying you cant. After word it will stay uncheck/uncheckable. </p>