http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/vista Beta Testers Forum en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 07:43:14 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/superfetch#post-1029 Fri, 22 Jan 2010 12:19:08 +0000 zPedro 1029@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Did anybody try to disable superfetch? If so what were the results? Do you think it's advisable? </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-841 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:56:42 +0000 tolisbak 841@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>If it is enabled, Version 4.0.0.543 makes my system crash after logging in. On next boot (thankfully) it is disabled. Then it will make vista crash within 3 hours after enabling it. I had far fewer crashes with older versions.</p> <p>At least it works great on my netbook. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/dual-boot-usb-cache-full-from-xp-vista-cant-utilize#post-902 Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:32:50 +0000 Atertract 902@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>XP SP3, Vista SP2, 4GB USB drive formatted FAT32 with HP utility.</p> <p>Installed Beta 4.0 (build 544) on XP, optimized USB drive for performance, allocated USB cache file, everything went smoothly and turned out functional. </p> <p>Installed 544 on Vista. Added CacheFileName=\\eboostr2.dat at HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EBoost\Parameters in registry as described here, with the exception that \Parameters didn't show up until after reboot: <a href="http://beta.eboostr.com/blog/feedback/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp1/" rel="nofollow">http://beta.eboostr.com/blog/feedback/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp1/</a></p> <p>Vista installation was successful. Optimized USB drive for performance. However, as one might expect, the flash drive is almost completely full from use in XP, and reads full and unusable by eBoostr. Shouldn't the cache be cleared on restart/reboot to allow two different operating systems full use of the entirety of the memory? Is eBoostr dual-boot support facilitated by allocating (and splitting) the space on a USB drive manually? Or do I simply need to free up enough space to build the USB cache in Vista initially, after which both OS will dynamically make use of the entire flash drive (write over each other's caches)? </p>