http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/tags/x64 Beta Testers Forum en-US Thu, 09 Feb 2012 17:14:32 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/x64-windows-but-not-really-allocate-max-than-3072-meg-of-memory#post-1178 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 17:54:44 +0000 sst 1178@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>Just look at this screenshot = </p> <p>&lt;blockcode&gt;<img />src="http://beta.eboostr.com/?attachment_id=1561" alt=""<br /> ---<br /> It look to have bugs, ...</p> <p>----------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/x64-windows-but-not-really-allocate-max-than-3072-meg-of-memory#post-1177 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 16:50:49 +0000 sst 1177@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>I only test, inside Windows 7 ultimate x64, 8 gig ram. Ntfs. eBoostr = v4.0.551 Beta.</p> <p>I try a 3072, 4096, 5120 RamCaches.</p> <p>Inside eBoostr it display that it have created it</p> <p>But inside Windows and others display memory left software = it really have not allocate the memory cache.</p> <p>It seem a bug inside, eBoostr beta.</p> <p>I will test with the eBoostr normal release, not the beta version.</p> <p>---<br /> something strange = look at this screenshot.</p> <p><img /></p> <p>---------------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand (sst) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/x64-windows-but-not-really-allocate-max-than-3072-meg-of-memory#post-1176 Sat, 06 Mar 2010 12:20:24 +0000 Zeioth 1176@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>You only have this problem under win7 64 or you tried other OS? I wish to help you, but only i have 4GB, not enough to test. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/x64-windows-but-not-really-allocate-max-than-3072-meg-of-memory#post-1158 Mon, 22 Feb 2010 06:57:45 +0000 sst 1158@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>My computer have [Windows 7 Ultimate x64], [8 Gig. Ram. DDR-2], [6 Gig Ram available]. [NTFS C: Partition].</p> <p>eBoostr Version: 4.0.0.547.</p> <p>---</p> <p>Then, i try to made a eBoostr RamCache bigger than 3 Gig. Then i have enter 4096, in the eBoostr RamCache section.</p> <p>The eBoostr software, display that it use it, but not Windows 7 x64. (If i go to Windows Task Manager, or an other program that display memory available, it display 6 Gig available.</p> <p>---</p> <p>Then it really work up to 3072 meg RamCache, on x64 Windows.</p> <p>---</p> <p>Please other users of x64 Windows, test at your side.</p> <p>----------------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand (sst) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-927 Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:36:12 +0000 Zorro_ARG 927@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi again. I was testing beta version build 544. I made some tests and problems repeated. Cause my english is poor, i will reproduce steps here. Something to take into account, i haven't had problems with eboostr using 8 gb pendrive (ocz rally2). System is Windows 7 x64, 6 GB DDR2-800, Q6600 Intel processor.<br /> Problems reappear after enabling SYSTEM MEMORY for cache. Also, I have no problems with eboostr deactivated or when using it with the pendrive. Also memory is ok, several hours of testing with memtest and orthos.</p> <p>1. Enabled SYSTEM MEMORY, assigned 1 GB of it.<br /> 2. Reboot<br /> 3. After logging in, skype error and myphoneexplorer too.<br /> 4. Copy SKYPE.EXE to desktop.<br /> 5. Removed SYSTEM MEMORY CACHE from eboostr, leaving pendrive only.<br /> 6. I made a binary comparison, skype filesize is 25626408 bytes total. Differences found at these locations: Range 1: 001e4c00-001fffff // Range 2: 005e4c00-005fffff // Range 3: 007e4c00-007fffff // Range 4: 009e4c00-009fffff // Range 5: 00de4c00-00dfffff // Range 6: 00fe4c00-00ffffff // Range 7: 013e4c00-013ffffff // Range 8: 015e4c00-015ffff.</p> <p>I hope it helps to locate the problem. Bye. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-918 Sat, 12 Dec 2009 09:58:38 +0000 mradr 918@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>So your saying to delete the cache and rebuild? </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-912 Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:35:46 +0000 Zorro_ARG 912@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi. I was testing an earlier version of eboostr 4 beta, about one month ago. I had also problems when it was enabled. The problems I had were related to errors when programs were loading, for example, during boot. I took as an example skype.exe. Sometimes it loaded with errors during boot. At that time, I saved a copy of SKYPE.EXE, then uninstalled eboostr and rebooted. After that, i used a software for binary comparsison, and the two versions of skype.exe were different!! If I can remember well, differences appear in blocks of data, for example at E400 1E400, filled with 00. I can´t remember the block size, sorry. But maybe there is a problem over there. I´m using readyboost right now, since then, one month or so, and I never saw a problem like the one described again. Also same hardware and software. Windows 7 x64 edition, 6 gigas of ram. Using RAM or USB pendrive, or a mix of two for testing. I will try again with build 544 and see what happens. Greetings. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-868 Wed, 02 Dec 2009 13:19:50 +0000 mradr 868@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Np, to bad I couldn't help solve your issu. Um, maybe try to see what happens if you uninstall the other program and use eboostr when you get some free time tho. If it still happens, then yea its eboostr. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-862 Wed, 02 Dec 2009 10:05:30 +0000 tolisbak 862@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>With windows XP 32-bit, on the same hardware I had frequent crashes with itunes. </p> <p>In some instances in vista x64 (after the installation of a nvidia vga card) there were also some blank screens.<br /> On the other hand, there is a lot of programs loaded with windows.</p> <p>Still, after the unistallation of eboostr the system hasn't crashed yet. </p> <p>I' ll wait for the next beta release. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-859 Wed, 02 Dec 2009 05:31:35 +0000 mradr 859@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Very strange, it could be a combination of the two, but I wounder if it isn't something else in play..., If nothing, I would have to say its the cfospeed thats maybe causing the issure here. TCP/IP was mess up and cfospeed uses the TCP/IP sys...</p> <p>As for the ntoskrnl.exe, from what I get from the web is that, it could be a number of things from RAM to burning software. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-857 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 14:03:17 +0000 tolisbak 857@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>21 times this</p> <p>"On Thu 26/11/2009 7:28:07 μμ your computer crashe<br /> This was likely caused by the following module: ntoskrnl.exe<br /> Bugcheck code: 0x1000007E (0xFFFFFFFFC0000005, 0xFFFFF80002E61F30, 0xFFFFFA60019DB448, 0xFFFFFA60019DAE20)<br /> Error: SYSTEM_THREAD_EXCEPTION_NOT_HANDLED_M<br /> Dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\Mini112609-03.dmp<br /> file path: C:\Windows\system32\ntoskrnl.exe<br /> product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System<br /> company: Microsoft Corporation<br /> description: NT Kernel &amp; System<br /> The crash took place in a standard Microsoft module. Your system configuration may be incorrect, possibly the culprit may be another driver on your system which cannot be identified at this time. "</p> <p>3 times this:</p> <p>On Mon 9/11/2009 7:13:20 μμ your computer crashed<br /> This was likely caused by the following module: tcpip.sys<br /> Bugcheck code: 0xD1 (0x40, 0x2, 0x0, 0xFFFFFA6000F193CB)<br /> Error: DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL<br /> Dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\Mini110909-01.dmp<br /> file path: C:\Windows\system32\drivers\tcpip.sys<br /> product: Microsoft® Windows® Operating System<br /> company: Microsoft Corporation<br /> description: TCP/IP Driver<br /> The crash took place in a standard Microsoft module. Your system configuration may be incorrect, possibly the culprit may be another driver on your system which cannot be identified at this time. </p> <p>2 times this:<br /> On Sun 8/11/2009 7:34:58 μμ your computer crashed<br /> This was likely caused by the following module: cfosspeed.sys<br /> Bugcheck code: 0xD1 (0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF, 0x2, 0x8, 0xFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF)<br /> Error: DRIVER_IRQL_NOT_LESS_OR_EQUAL<br /> Dump file: C:\Windows\Minidump\Mini110809-01.dmp<br /> file path: C:\Windows\system32\drivers\cfosspeed.sys<br /> product: cFosSpeed Driver<br /> company: cFos Software GmbH<br /> description: cFosSpeed Driver</p> <p>Maybe it's the combination of eboostr and cfospeed that causes the problem.</p> <p>Now I am using Readyboost and the system hasn't crashed yet. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-854 Tue, 01 Dec 2009 12:20:14 +0000 mradr 854@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Crash, as in like BSOD, or just frezz-crash? If it's a BSOD, could you upload the minidump? This can be found in:</p> <p>c:\windows\minidump\*the date/time/log file* </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/vista-x64-crashes#post-841 Sun, 29 Nov 2009 05:56:42 +0000 tolisbak 841@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>If it is enabled, Version 4.0.0.543 makes my system crash after logging in. On next boot (thankfully) it is disabled. Then it will make vista crash within 3 hours after enabling it. I had far fewer crashes with older versions.</p> <p>At least it works great on my netbook. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-still-install-in-x86-program-folder-when-i-using-x64-windows#post-712 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:55:47 +0000 sst 712@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Final, [8 Gig. ram DDR-2 DualChannel]. </p> <p>For the moment Eboostr, maximum limit is "4 gig memory cache".<br /> ---<br /> But you can made a "&gt; 4 gig disk cache", "with external media must have Ntfs".<br /> ---<br /> I hope soon, an x64 version of eBoostr. = To made a memory cache bigger than 4 Gig.</p> <p>----------------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand (sst) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-still-install-in-x86-program-folder-when-i-using-x64-windows#post-655 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:04:15 +0000 mradr 655@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Your right, eboostr isn't 64 bit supported yet. You can still run eboostr just fine under the 64 bit OS. Eboostr was design for lower class system (aka 32 bit), but you still get reap the benefits from the speed boost it gives you:P</p> <p>I would also want to see eboostr be supported under the 64bit OS if it can. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-still-install-in-x86-program-folder-when-i-using-x64-windows#post-654 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:06:06 +0000 Yoshizuki 654@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>i ask this because when i install a x64 program it will install in "Program Files" not in "Program Files (x86)"<br /> or eboostr still not fully support for x64?<br /> tested in Windows 7 x64 </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/xp-pro-64-bit-installation-just-an-fwiw#post-642 Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:21:05 +0000 Savage1701 642@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Exactly, I could only get the error once. No problems with Eboostr beta after "double install". </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-241 Thu, 24 Sep 2009 20:55:19 +0000 exaslave 241@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I got a 0x40 error, I have a windows 7 x64 and my "unmanageable" RAM is because of my mobo not my windows (shows 4.00GB (3.12GB usable) for example and it's just limitation of the chip), makes sense that it cant use it then because even the mobo cant use it but maybe it should show a precaution/warning to this?</p> <p>Not sure if it would show the same in 32-bit windows tho althou I guess it would. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/xp-pro-64-bit-installation-just-an-fwiw#post-172 Thu, 17 Sep 2009 04:02:08 +0000 mradr 172@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Your not the only one, but no one can reproduce the error more than once for some reason.</p> <p><a href="http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-chache-service-stop-and-allocation-hide" rel="nofollow">http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-chache-service-stop-and-allocation-hide</a><br /> <a href="http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/cache-service-iis-stopped-permanently" rel="nofollow">http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/cache-service-iis-stopped-permanently</a> </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/xp-pro-64-bit-installation-just-an-fwiw#post-169 Wed, 16 Sep 2009 20:44:47 +0000 Savage1701 169@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I had to install and reboot the beta twice to get the service to start. It did not even appear in local services after the first install. Now its there. Cache seems stable. Running 1GB RAM cache with it since I have 8GB on this 64-bit system to play with. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-73 Tue, 08 Sep 2009 10:29:18 +0000 Ilya Elenik 73@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Ok<br /> Thank you for your report<br /> For now check box will be disabled for 64-bit version </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-36 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 11:35:36 +0000 mradr 36@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Yea I know, but the error still there, so maybe have it uncheckable when using eboostr on a 64 bit OS? Other wise the error sorta miss leading to a normal user. Even with the 8GB, witch I think is the limit for the home user 64 bit os, its doing it to. So really it should only be checkable for anything + 8GB on the windows 64 bit, no?</p> <p>Starter: 8GB<br /> Home Basic: 8GB<br /> Home Premium: 16GB<br /> Professional: 192GB<br /> Enterprise: 192GB<br /> Ultimate: 192GB</p> <p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=4254" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.zdnet.com/hardware/?p=4254</a> </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-35 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 10:03:07 +0000 Ilya Elenik 35@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>64 bit OS uses all available memory - it does not have any hidden resources </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-34 Fri, 04 Sep 2009 06:50:33 +0000 sst 34@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>I have the same bug, ... (Windows 7 RC Build 7100 x64, 8 Gig. Ram)</p> <p>----------------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand (sst) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/bug-64bit-first-time-run-thought-boxs#post-27 Thu, 03 Sep 2009 23:22:53 +0000 mradr 27@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Windows 64 bit vista, 4 GB of ram, no USB device. When you first install eboostr 4.0 build 529, it sees its your frist time and ask if you want to set up the devices, say yes. After witch the screen will come up, and the &quot;Enable use of hidden system memory&quot; will be uncheck/checkable. Check it and then it will thow a error at you saying you cant. After word it will stay uncheck/uncheckable. </p>