<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!-- generator="bbPress/1.0.2" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
	<channel>
		<title>eBoostr Beta Program Forum &#187; Topic: Feature Comparison: eBoostr vs. Windows 7 ReadyBoost</title>
		<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/feature-comparison-eboostr-vs-windows-7-readyboost</link>
		<description>Beta Testers Forum</description>
		<language>en-US</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 20:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<generator>http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2</generator>
		<textInput>
			<title><![CDATA[Search]]></title>
			<description><![CDATA[Search all topics from these forums.]]></description>
			<name>q</name>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php</link>
		</textInput>
		<atom:link href="http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/rss/topic/feature-comparison-eboostr-vs-windows-7-readyboost" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

		<item>
			<title>Doug on "Feature Comparison: eBoostr vs. Windows 7 ReadyBoost"</title>
			<link>http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/feature-comparison-eboostr-vs-windows-7-readyboost#post-1170</link>
			<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 17:33:08 +0000</pubDate>
			<dc:creator>Doug</dc:creator>
			<guid isPermaLink="false">1170@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/</guid>
			<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm led to believe that ReadyBoost in Windows 7 has borrowed some of eBoostr's features.  For instance, I understand that it is no longer limited to a 4GB cache size, and also that you can pin applications to the cache as in eBoostr.  Is my understanding correct?  How do the two stack up in terms of features and performance?
&#60;/p&#62;</description>
		</item>

	</channel>
</rss>

