http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/forum/installation Beta Testers Forum en-US Fri, 10 Feb 2012 08:00:58 +0000 http://bbpress.org/?v=1.0.2 q http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/search.php http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/applications-prority-searching-only-drive-c#post-1393 Mon, 14 Mar 2011 22:04:27 +0000 laferrierejc 1393@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>nevermind, I'm a dumbass. Just ordered the product, happy it does the mount points. Having a problem setting maxfilesize and it sticking. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/applications-prority-searching-only-drive-c#post-1388 Sat, 13 Nov 2010 09:41:14 +0000 laferrierejc 1388@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>this is super lame for people who use unix like mount points in windows to minimize fragmentation.</p> <p>I have my docs mapped to another partition on the same drive,<br /> same for program files and program files (x86)</p> <p>The problem was the same in eboostr 3.</p> <p>So only my c: drive (which are only my windows files) are cached.</p> <p>Wahhh!!!!! </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/applications-prority-searching-only-drive-c#post-1138 Wed, 17 Feb 2010 10:12:54 +0000 Andrey Zarudnev 1138@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Actually we do not scan the whole disk for apps. We scan only the most common shortcut locations like Desktop, Start Menu, Quick Launch and others. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/applications-prority-searching-only-drive-c#post-1121 Tue, 16 Feb 2010 04:11:46 +0000 wiroj 1121@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>eboostr 4.547: Applications Priority search only drive C (XP SP3), I have to add other drive applications manually. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/error-codes-on-detecting-unmanaged-ram#post-1041 Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:32:52 +0000 PangOS 1041@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <blockquote><p><cite>wwjd0691 <a href="http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/error-codes-on-detecting-unmanaged-ram#post-1038">wrote</a>:</cite></p> <p>The first one is from my sytem and the other is from my friend's computer.<br /> What's the meaning of 0x400 error &amp; 0x100 error? Anybody can explain about it.<br /> Thanks. </p></blockquote> <p>Yea I can't get the extra 1GB RAM to work anymore, forgot to mention in my post. I get 0x100 error. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/error-codes-on-detecting-unmanaged-ram#post-1038 Mon, 25 Jan 2010 16:12:19 +0000 wwjd0691 1038@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>System 1<br /> CPU: T8100, RAM: 3Gb, OS: Windosws XP 32bit<br /> Message from automatic configuration says<br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------<br /> Detecting available devices... 1 found... Done<br /> Detecting unmanaged RAM... 0x400 error...Done<br /> Measuring \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolume1 performance... Done<br /> Read speed: 51609 KB/sec, Average seek time: 8.455 ms.<br /> Device: System Memory, Recommended cache size: 674MB<br /> Done<br /> --------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>System 2<br /> CPU: T9400, RAM: 4Gb, OS: Windows XP 32bit<br /> Message from automatic configuration says<br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------<br /> Detecting available devices... 2 found... Done<br /> Detecting unmanaged RAM... 0x100 error...Done<br /> Measuring \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolume3 performance... Done<br /> Read speed: 55679 KB/sec, Average seek time: 8.081 ms.<br /> Measuring \\?\GLOBALROOT\Device\HarddiskVolume1 performance... Done<br /> Read speed: 60620 KB/sec, Average seek time: 7.265 ms.<br /> Device: System Memory, Recommended cache size: 680MB<br /> Done<br /> -------------------------------------------------------------------</p> <p>The first one is from my sytem and the other is from my friend's computer.<br /> What's the meaning of 0x400 error &amp; 0x100 error? Anybody can explain about it.<br /> Thanks. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/dell-mini-10-eboostr-any-insights#post-1036 Sun, 24 Jan 2010 08:49:34 +0000 rwiltshi1 1036@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Great Thanks. That may work well in that this dell mini 10 cannot be upgraded to the newer versions that can have 2 gig (even though this model is only 4 months old)...Will try .</p> <p>Thanks,</p> <p>Ryland </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/dell-mini-10-eboostr-any-insights#post-1034 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 16:14:14 +0000 mradr 1034@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Thos are perty good for a computer with only one gig. If your not looking into spending $40 or more for ram, I would totally get another USB maybe to help out too. This way you can spread the work from your 8GB sub to another (maybe 8GB) usb for even more cache access speed. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/dell-mini-10-eboostr-any-insights#post-1033 Sat, 23 Jan 2010 14:17:37 +0000 rwiltshi1 1033@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi,</p> <p>Since my Dell 10 only has 1 gig of memory. I take the recommend option and not use any memory for caching. Just us a 8 gig usb stick and this is my performance info, and it recognizes 4 gig of the memory stick: </p> <p>My access speed is: 10.421048MB/s<br /> cache Access Speed: 25.122999MB/s<br /> Ratio is : 2.453167</p> <p>Obviously, I'm not a performance genus, but these appear to be pretty good responses. Any feed back would be appreciated </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/i-have-tested-eboostr-4-beta-inside-windows-7-ultimate-x64-final-build-7600#post-817 Fri, 20 Nov 2009 07:22:35 +0000 anakete 817@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>i have uploaded my memory.dmp to <a href="http://drop.io/eboostr" rel="nofollow">http://drop.io/eboostr</a> </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/i-have-tested-eboostr-4-beta-inside-windows-7-ultimate-x64-final-build-7600#post-812 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 09:19:48 +0000 Zeioth 812@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>anakete, may be you should send your memory.dmp<br /> <a href="http://beta.eboostr.com/beta/how-to-report-blue-screen-error/" rel="nofollow">http://beta.eboostr.com/beta/how-to-report-blue-screen-error/</a><br /> Blue screens are usually memory problems, in my experience. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/i-have-tested-eboostr-4-beta-inside-windows-7-ultimate-x64-final-build-7600#post-811 Thu, 19 Nov 2009 08:49:44 +0000 anakete 811@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I can't use ebootstr with windows 7 x64 ultimate.<br /> i get a bluecsreen after installation with<br /> process1_initialization_failed<br /> stop 0x0000006B<br /> eboostr 3.0 works fine.... </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/problem-with-version-543#post-793 Fri, 13 Nov 2009 20:45:43 +0000 chooky 793@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Just reboot and install again. I had the same problem and this worked. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/problem-with-version-543#post-779 Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:04:26 +0000 nimbus 779@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi,</p> <p> After program instalation a have this message:</p> <p>System status: Driver is not loaded </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-still-install-in-x86-program-folder-when-i-using-x64-windows#post-712 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 06:55:47 +0000 sst 712@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>Windows 7 x64 Ultimate Final, [8 Gig. ram DDR-2 DualChannel]. </p> <p>For the moment Eboostr, maximum limit is "4 gig memory cache".<br /> ---<br /> But you can made a "&gt; 4 gig disk cache", "with external media must have Ntfs".<br /> ---<br /> I hope soon, an x64 version of eBoostr. = To made a memory cache bigger than 4 Gig.</p> <p>----------------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand (sst) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/test-eboostr-version-4-beta-in-microsoft-windows-7-enterprise#post-710 Sun, 01 Nov 2009 04:51:57 +0000 nimbus 710@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, </p> <p> I test this program and at first time installation pass without problems, using of this program also good. Tested with APACER AH160 4GB USB 2.0 FLASH DRIVE RED. Only problem I can't enable use of hidden system memory. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-still-install-in-x86-program-folder-when-i-using-x64-windows#post-655 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:04:15 +0000 mradr 655@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Your right, eboostr isn't 64 bit supported yet. You can still run eboostr just fine under the 64 bit OS. Eboostr was design for lower class system (aka 32 bit), but you still get reap the benefits from the speed boost it gives you:P</p> <p>I would also want to see eboostr be supported under the 64bit OS if it can. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/why-still-install-in-x86-program-folder-when-i-using-x64-windows#post-654 Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:06:06 +0000 Yoshizuki 654@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>i ask this because when i install a x64 program it will install in "Program Files" not in "Program Files (x86)"<br /> or eboostr still not fully support for x64?<br /> tested in Windows 7 x64 </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/start-up-build-40536#post-503 Sat, 10 Oct 2009 13:04:52 +0000 mradr 503@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Theres 2 "build" the caches, the 1st one just builds the files and the 2nd builds the cache it self. </p> <p>Unless something else it up. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/start-up-build-40536#post-495 Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:30:12 +0000 postasat 495@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>At start-up, if you choose to build a cache, the window close but nothing happen.</p> <p>You must open the control panel and choose again to build a cache.</p> <p>Windows xp sp3<br /> 3gb ram </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/i-have-tested-eboostr-4-beta-inside-windows-7-ultimate-x64-final-build-7600#post-422 Wed, 07 Oct 2009 02:01:01 +0000 steve30x 422@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I have been using Eboostr with windows 7 since the first windows 7 BETA with no problems. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/applications-priority#post-369 Sat, 03 Oct 2009 14:26:04 +0000 Art 369@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, the file "application.ini" (with priority applications list) has a number at the beginning of each line, usually 1000. I would like to know if this number can be adjusted? Thanks Art </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp2#post-304 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 05:27:49 +0000 Yves 304@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hello mikei :)<br /> "Just in case you would like to specify cache file names for your OS manually (for multiboot system with same boot device for example). There is new DWORD registry value<br /> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EBoost\Parameters]<br /> “CacheFileIndex” - DWORD value.<br /> For example “CacheFileIndex”= 1000"<br /> Thank you for your informations. I just don't know yet what is meant by "1000", is "1000" the file size or a file-cachename to be chosen by myself? For example, to be named in Windows 7 as "1000" and in XP Pro named "1001" ?<br /> Please give us an example how to use this registry entry for a multiboot of two OS, such as XP Pro and 7 Ultimate, thanks ;) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp2#post-302 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:51:32 +0000 Yves 302@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>I see there is no language option in eBoostr Pro 3.0.2.508 as it has been in 3.0.1.498, using that 3.0.1.498 on my laptop XP Home SP3 because eBoostr Pro 3.0.2.508 isn't able to create a cache file there for RAM (C:) or for USB-device (B:). eBoostr Beta 4.0.0.535 and eBoostr Beta 4.0.0.536 are creating problems on my laptop as well. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp2#post-299 Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:39:53 +0000 Yves 299@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>eBoostr Pro 3.0.2.508 - Help - Help - Tutorials... - eBoostr bei einem Dual-Boot System<br /> Wenn Sie eBoostr auf einem Dual-Boot oder Multi-Boot System mit demselben USB-Stick einsetzen wollen, sollten Sie eBoostr auf Ihrem Windows-System so einstellen, dass ein anderer Cache-Dateiname benutzt wird. Fügen Sie hierzu einen neuen Registry Wert hinzu:<br /> [HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EBoost\Parameters]<br /> CacheFileName="\\eboostr2.dat"<br /> Um diesen Wert hinzuzufügen, gehen Sie bitte wie folgt vor:<br /> 1. Klicken Sie Start, Ausführen, geben Sie Regedit in die geöffnete Box ein und klicken Sie OK.<br /> 2. In der Registry suchen Sie den folgenden Schlüssel: HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EBoost\Parameters.<br /> 3. Aus dem Bearbeiten-Menü wählen Sie Neu.<br /> 4. Wählen Sie String Value und tippen Sie CacheFileName in die Textbox.<br /> 5. Doppelklicken Sie den neuen Eintrag und tippen Sie \\eboostr2.dat in die Datenwert Textbox.<br /> 6. Klicken Sie OK, um die Änderungen abzuspeichern.<br /> 7. Starten Sie den Rechner neu, damit die Änderungen wirksam werden können.<br /> Bei einer Multi-Boot Konfiguration mith drei oder mehr Geräten, fügen Sie bitte einen entsprechenden Registry Wert hinzu (zum Beispiel "\\eboostr3.dat", "\\eboostr4.dat" etc.) auf allen anderen Systemen hinzu.</p> <p>Sorry, there is no helpfile in english. I'm using eBoostr Pro 3.0.2.508 on XP Pro SP3 and eBoostr Beta 4.0.0.536 on Window 7 Ultimate. eBoostr Beta 4.0.0.536 cannot be used on XP Pro SP3 here as it is creating blue screens and other error messages.</p> <p>As i see in eBoostr Beta 4.0.0.536, there is not such a helpfile with similar or identical indications. So i think, i cannot follow those hints above and separate the eBoostr-USB-cache for XP pro-usage and 7 Ultimate-usage, right ? By the way, there are no "eboostr.dat" entries in registry yet. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/i-have-tested-eboostr-4-beta-inside-windows-7-ultimate-x64-final-build-7600#post-274 Tue, 29 Sep 2009 06:45:12 +0000 sst 274@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hi, ...</p> <p>I have tested eBoostr 4 Beta, inside = Windows 7 Ultimate x64, Final Build 7600, 8 Gig Ram. (TechNet Plus)</p> <p>It work without compatibility problem, ...</p> <p>----------------------------<br /> Sylvain St-Amand (sst) </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/upgraded-tpo-4-from-3-no-problems#post-69 Tue, 08 Sep 2009 07:40:44 +0000 Ilya Elenik 69@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Try to click &quot;Add...&quot; button. &quot;Configure devices&quot; dialog should appear. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/upgraded-tpo-4-from-3-no-problems#post-67 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:05:06 +0000 Emile 67@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Hello,<br /> No problems, same speed.</p> <p>FYI I do not see the new image as available on your beta site , I still have the &quot;old&quot; eBoostr window </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp2#post-66 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:51:48 +0000 nikomiudon 66@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>We wish to express our gratitude. </p> http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/topic/eboostr-in-dual-boot-xp-sp3-and-vista-sp2#post-65 Mon, 07 Sep 2009 10:25:24 +0000 mikei 65@http://beta.eboostr.com/forum/ <p>Just in case you would like to specify cache file names for your OS manually (for multiboot system with same boot device for example). There is new DWORD registry value </p> <p>[HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SYSTEM\CurrentControlSet\Services\EBoost\Parameters]<br /> “CacheFileIndex” - DWORD value. </p> <p>For example “CacheFileIndex”= 1000 </p>