eBoostr performances decreasing
By artamir | October 24th, 2007 | 2:41 am
beta 4: stability increasing, performances decreasing?
Since the eboostr beta 2 it seems to me the speed performance is decreasing. eboostr 2 was the best in system speed enhancing, then eboostr 3 was less useful, now eboostr 4 seems not to have significant effects on the system. my all applications seem to me to have returned to the pre-eboostr speed. is it only a feeling of mine or is it real?
Photoshop 8, ArchiCAD 11, The Battle for Middle Earth 2 seem to me to be now the same than before i installed eboostr.
Oct 24, 2007
i thought for me that eboostr 3 was the fastest and actually i got less problems
Oct 24, 2007
So did I. For me beta3 was the best so far too.
Oct 25, 2007
…i don’t know if you tested the beta 2 release. it was really amazing for me, for speeding up the system. But i had more than one system-crash. The beta 3 was very stable, but less fast. The beta 4 is very “slow” and most of my favorite apps seems not to feel that eboostr’s working. May be the developing team will work again on the eboostr speed performace, by the stability has been reached…
Oct 25, 2007
artamir: In our comparative measurement of beta2 and beta3 the last one was an absolute winer. Do you have the BETA 2 installation file? Can you publish any objective comparisons of BETA 2 and BETA 4?
Also please provide technical characteristics of your flash memory and an overall cache hit ratio for application loading.
Thank you
Oct 25, 2007
i sended my speed measuring .txt files about tests, boot and measuring speed. my tech data are the same since i started the beta testing. Asus a4k mobile workstation, athlon64 3200+, 2 gb ram kingston, usb 2.0, pendrive transcend jf v30/4gb usb 2.0, winXP pro sp2 updated, mozilla firefox web browser.
the apps loading tests are in the txt files i sended. my feelings say to me the apps speed load time is now increased. by the last speed tests, my apps were on 0,99-1,00 ratio.
Oct 25, 2007
Thank you