Cache Viewer Bug in V3 Build 483

By Senthil | January 2nd, 2009 |

Hello,

Cache Viewer shows many items as ‘Deleted Entry’.  I have given the screenshot in the below link.

http://img90.imageshack.us/img90/3113/eboostrbugspm8.jpg

Hope this gets fixed.

Thanks.

Language Bugs in V3.0 Build 483

By Senthil | |

Hello,

Changing the Language of the eboostr Control Panel, doesn’t change all the Menus.

Some of them are :

1)  Most of the Language changes doesn’t change the Menu Item ‘Application Priority…’.   For eg., change the language to ‘Francais’ or ‘hrvatski’, but still the ‘Application Priority…’ Menu item doesn’t change the language.

2)  Change language to ‘Make*****’ Language and still all the Menu items remain in English Language only.

The Language Change needs to checked for all Languages and fixed

Thanks.

Four 2GB flash drives vs. one 8GB flash drive?

By perth1415 | |

Hi,

As the title says it, I was wondering which of the two would give me more mileage? and, why?

Sorry if this’s a wrong place to ask such queries.

Thnaks,

Partha

List of known bugs?

By perth1415 | |

Hi,

It’d be great if you keep a list of known bugs here, updated regularly; it’ll save the testers from wasting time in stalking old issues, already confirmed by several others.

I did a search for “known issues”, did not find any link, that’s why writing this note.

Thanks,

Partha

Anomalous Speed Check Numbers?

By Colonel ONeill | |

Tested on XP SP3
Intel Core 2 Duo 2.10GHz
1GB of DDR2 RAM

384 MB Memory Cache
——————————
Direct access speed: 17.00 MB/s
Cache enabled access speed: 844.89 MB/s
Ratio: 49.70

Tested on 2000 SP5
Intel Coppermine 800MHz
320MB of PC133/100 RAM

64 MB Memory Cache
——————————
Direct access speed: 3.45 MB/s
Cache enabled access speed: 14.08 MB/s
Ratio: 4.08

E-boostr is a great app

By matt | |

E-boostr is a great app and has given my now slightly aging P4 2.9 Ghz (Single core), 1.5 GB generic memory, 2 x 250 GB IDE Hard
Disks, ATI X1650 Graphics 600 W Nexus PSU a definite boost, removed lag from my system nearly entirely, speeded up the start up
no beta issues still using build 479, going to upgrade to 483 before my next reboot!, using 512 of system memory and 2 GIG Verbatim
15 mb/s Flash drive

Happy new year !!!

Hibernate issue?

By RoadKillDave | January 1st, 2009 |

I just noticed that when I turned my Acer Aspire One back on after XP was hibernated that drive D: (ebootered sdhc card) had to run a disk error scan when XP booted. Is anyone else having this problem? I am running version 483?

Thanks!

Minimum Memory Cache and Size-adaptivity

By Colonel ONeill | |

I amd unable to set the system memory cache lower than 64mb using the textbox, and no less than 256mb using the slider. Ignoring the discontinuity… is the low end of 64mb fixed regardless of the total memory in the system?

With 320mb of RAM, devoting 64mb to a cache, that for the moment does not seem to be size adaptive like the Vista counterpart, it actually begins to impact performance when using more memory intensive applications (and their combinations).

Photoshop on this system becomes a bit more sluggish, and so does Microsoft Word (don’t ask me why). This behavior becomes pronounced especially in the presence of Firefox 3 (for well documented reasons).

Inclusion list?

By Colonel ONeill | |

Now that there’s an exclusion list, will there be an inclusion list for the forcible inclusion of certain files?

This would help as I’d like to load my overly bloated shell32.dll (Stupid Vista Icon Pack :P) into memory, my icons load slowly.

But I digress, the Inclusion list would be an excellent feature, but for more advanced users.

Fragmentation of memory cards

By Crisse | |

Hello,

I noticed that after using my two SDHC memory cards with eBoostr, they were fragmented (checked with Windows XP’s own tool Disk Defragment).

Ok, I removed both cards from eBoostr caching and reformatted them. After that I added them again from eBoostr’s control panel. Then I let eBoostr to create a cache to those cards. Then I checked again Disk Defragment tool and was totally surprised… I realised that memory cards were already fragmented although the cache for eBoostr was just created on them. Fragmented file was eBoostr.dat, is this normal? Does Windows XP identify eBoostr’s cache files on memory cards as fragmented although they are not?