Cant Remove Ram Cash

By Computer_Tech | January 26th, 2009 |

after upgrading my Os from XP to Vista i cannot Remove the ram Cash this is a problem that i hope can be fixed as it wont use it or get rid of it but its still taking up the ram

Def Lic

By pmal | |

When could we expect the def  licence or will the beta keep working after the 1st February

Build 490 works great

By Doug | |

Nothing but good luck with Beta 3.0.490.  It fixed the cache problem, and my 8GB SD expresscard now fills to 100%.  Very stable so far.

XPP SP3 2GB RAM IBM T60p

Posting Stable system, build 490 Vista Ultimate SP1

By Tom | |

Continued on with testing now on build 490, on my portable desktop replacement (overgrown laptop) with stable system.

My system:

HP P4 3.4 GHz Intel chip

2 gig ram,

128 meg video,

250 gig WD 5400Rpm

Several external DVD and HDD ranging from 250 gig to 750 gig.

Orginally running XP media center with sp3, have a fully upgraded Vista Ultimate SP1.

 Is a very good machine and I have no major issues or problems in system just push it very hard.

 OK,  I have tested using a Compact Flash 8 gig card, (in a HIGHSPEED  32bit card bus reader) and a 2 gig high speed SD card on the build in a reader.  Current set up is build 490 beta, using one 4 gig sony usb drive.

Without actually testing numbers, system is very stable, and most noticed on shut down.

Previous build (and ver 2) would sometime hang on driver shut down.

Only question, Current build is set to license exprie 1 FEB, are we ready or pusing this for more testing.

Love this program and recommend it to everyone.

Thanks Thomas

Phantom drive bug in control panel still found in 490

By davebt34 | |

Version 490 has no bugs I can find except for the one I report earlier which still exists. It is the phantom drive bug in control panel which appears on XP systems that running 24 X 7.

http://www.eboostr.com/closedbeta/feedback/hard-drives-showing-eboostr-control-panel-cache-drives-window/

Fix that one and I think you have a real winner on your hands.

I have seen real performance gains on all my systems

Performance Checking… Do it BEFORE you configure eBoostr!

By William Estep | January 25th, 2009 |

Just to give everybody some ideas about what “performance” you might see from your systems BEFORE you implement eBootr — knowing this information will help you decide where to put your cache file(s) or whether having eBoostr will even benefit or hinder you. 

Of course, system RAM is always THE best place to put cached information, but not all of us wish to give up a huge chunk of System RAM all the time (other programs might need it, e.g. Photoshop).  So, I’ve run some testing on my own system to provide you with samples.  I have a USB flash drive (not the best, but large capacity for my own purposes), an onboard Intel RAID controller (RAID 1 – Mirroring), and a GIGABYTE i-RAM SATA-I drive with 4GB of DDR.  Here are the results using HDTACH.  In my case, the [2nd] BEST place for the cache file is on the i-RAM disk (along with my pagefile, Temporary Internet Files, and system TEMP folder), where #1 would be system RAM of course.

Rankings of performance:

#1: System RAM
#2:  i-RAM Disk
#3: Intel RAID 1
#4: USB Flash Drive

Significant performance drop after úpdating to 490

By Crisse | |

Hello,

I noticed a significant performance drop after updating to 490 from version 487. Please compare these pictures, first from version 487:

Memory card SanDisk Extreme 4GB speed 30x (20 MB/s)
http://img178.imageshack.us/my.php?image=eboostr304871st6.jpg

Memory card SanDisk Extreme 8GB speed 30x (20 MB/s)
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/5989/eboostr304872vc6.jpg

OK, that was excellent performance from eBoostr. Almost maximum speed my memory cards can achieve.
*****************************************
After updating to 490 results show the following:

Memory card SanDisk Extreme 4GB speed 30x (20 MB/s)
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/2254/eboostr304901ju6.jpg

Memory card SanDisk Extreme 8GB speed 30x (20 MB/s)
http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/5594/eboostr304902cg0.jpg
*****************************************
What you say? Speed has dropped so much I can’t even believe it. Maybe I have to downgrade to 487. I love this program but I do not know what can cause this.’

Best regards
Crisse

PCTOOLS ThreatFire the screen hangs

By unclerobmac | |

I have had numerous screen hangs but after about 30 seconds the mouse restores. But recently scanning with PcTools Threatfire the threatfire screen hangs but rest of screen seems to respond. Couldn’t use Task Manager or shutdown. Drive activity continued like something was going on. Threatfie screen in staus bar shows Not Responding. Waited 30 minutes the shutdown by holding power button until powered down.

Using eBoostr beta latest,  PcTools Threatfire 4.0.0.10.  Drive activity was shown by Hddled program.

Have had no blue screen of death at all.

Most times any poblem has bee whole screen freezes for about 30 seconds like explorer has to catch up then everyting contiues.

2 Threads for cache build

By sirmerlin860 | January 24th, 2009 |

MB:ASUS P5N32-E SLI Plus
CPU:Q6600 @ 2.4Ghz
SND:Soundmax Integrated Digital HD Audio
VID:Nvidia Geforce XFX 280 GTX XXX Edition
WIN:Vista Home Premium x64 SP2 beta 6002
HD:Seagate 250GB x2 raid (stripe)
RAM:8GB DDR2 800mhz SLI Ready (4X2GB)
34GB Eboostr 3.0.0.490: Ultra Speed 8GB, Centrios 8GB-200X, Retail Plus 32GB(16GB), ram 2GB

 

AVG Resident Shield Service is reading almost every file that eboostr reads (avgrsa.exe)

ebstrsvc.exe pid 1780 is using 2 threads and 0.25 average CPU during cache build. thats 0.0625% of my q6600 cpu.

total cache rebuild on my system takes about 1 hour per 8MB

seems much slower than 486. can more threads be used for caching?

Performance Improvement with SAMSUNG NC10

By gpat | |

No bugs so far.

Using the last build on a Samsung NC10, Windows 7 Build 7000 and 1 gb ram caching on a 4 GB SDHC.

Massive performance boost, no problems.

Keep up the good work!