By denisodisea | December 3rd, 2008 |
First: my Kaspersky Internet Security 8.0.0.50 6 gives installation errors with breaks activated, even excluding it from the index, is random problem, but damage my database and need to reinstall, this its en latest beta 3 from 1 dicember
Second: Sometimes Give me error the cache viewer, ramdonly too
My Spec: Windows SP3 English eith latest Patches, Intel Atom 1.6, 1 gb ram, 160 gb hd, acer one
By Zurko | |
For now everything works more smoothly than ver 2. I use eBoostr for RAM caching only.
Windows XP pro SP2 32 bit + 2 GB DDR3 RAM + quadcore proc
Zurko
By Tedd | |
Been using this software for almost a week now. Noticed that sometimes i will go inactive for a short while (the control panel turn yellow instead of green) for no reason. Other than that everything is fine. I noticed that if i use system memory for caching the boot time will get longer than normal. Is this normal?
By Federico Alvarez | |
Problem:
Not building cache with SD+System Memory
Steps to reproduce:
Add cache device: SD 1.9Gb (actually a 2Gb card, 1.9Gb available)
Add cache device: System Memory 512Mb (up to 2Gb)
Build cache reaches 49% and displays “System not working”, inmediatelly changes to “Paused”. (May be “System not working” is not the exact message, it changes really fast).
This steps reproduce to perfection in my laptop.
History:
First i’ve tried only with the SD and worked to perfection, noticed a up to a 50% speed-up in most aplications. Firefox performed much faster and smoothly. Avast antivirus also loadup faster and has less delay in starting Outlook 2007 plugin.
Then i added the System Memory, in order to fully test the product, and came with this error.
The System Memory without the SD works fine.
System description:
Notebook HP Pavilion dv9335
Intel Core 2 Duo 1.73GHz
RAM: 2Gb
Hdd: 140Gb 5400rpm
O.S.: Windows XP Professional, SP3
eBooster: 3.0, build 473
Hopes this helps.
Regards,
Federico Alvarez.
By spectra9 | |
Using build 473, WinXP SP3, 1GB RAM.
I’ve set up a 128MB of system memory cache on drive C: and all went smoothly. Later, I add a 2GB HD cache on my secondary harddisk and proceed to build the cache. However, this time the build process failed after reaching some random percentage and the system status reads “Pause”. I can try building the cache again but eventually the system status will read “Service is not running”. I’ve tried changing the order of creation (i.e HD cache first and RAM later, the build is successfull for the HD, but failed after adding the RAM cache). Event viewer logs the following error:
System Exception -1073741819 in eBoostr Service.
This never happen will the older builds
By proteo | |
I ve been using Beta 3 on an XP Core2 duo flawless, no problems at all, i will try to format in NTFS my Kingston 4 GB DT100 in order to see if there is speed improvement. Thanks
By Cosmin | |
been using eboostr for some time now. it helps. my objective was to diminish hdd usage as much as possible and i managed to obtain that somehow.
eboostr help at reads. it really does if you use a fast flash or ram cache. however i’m a Visual Studio user and compiling is a very intensive write business. in this case eboostr does not help and the hdd keeps thrashing (significantly less than without eboostr). last night i was searching for an alternative… and found one. i won’t tell you it’s name here. this one does not have the bells and whistles that eboostr has but it has some very nice features. to be frank i didn’t know how to config it the first time as i did not notice anything that marked it’s presence. it can set cache on partition level. you can specify whether it should read ahead. you can specify the cluster size as i think (i’m not sure) it does not cache files but clusters of them. it has another quewl feature. it can do lazy writes. what that means is that it can delay writes some time and that REALLY helps in compilation businesses. i noticed that the project files (*.sln,*slo) in VS get read and written very intesively. well this tool really helps. it helped silence my pc even if i had in the backgound utorrent oppen and doing lots of traffic. it does that without stopping to rebuild its cache.
has some disadvantages though. it only supports ram caching. the interface could be a lot better. it’s a lot more expensive.
my wishes:
– it would be great to have lazy writes in eboostr and option to use them or not. not a good idea to have lazy writes if you do not have an UPS.
– i would be great not to have stops for cache rebulding. the cache should update continuously and be always available.
right now i’m using eboostr with the flash memory and the other tool with the ram caching and lazy writes and it’s a big difference. if eboostr would do what i enumerated earlier it would provide a much better user experience and i’d be in love with it (and have no reason to go vista :) )
ps: using windows xp pro sp3 32bit
By moogerfooger | |
Hi,
Using a laptop Acer 5520,
AMD Turion 64X2 1900 mhz, mobo Acer Foquene, Gpu Nvidia GeForce 8400MG, 4 GHz system memory in dual channel.
O.S. Windows Vista Home premium
Using EBOOSTR beta v.3.0.473 build, (updated beta version 3.0.471) using the cache of a usb flash Sandisk 8 GHz.
To date I have not had any problem.
The system is more fluid, and the applications that I have given the priority (Excel, Autocad, Primus) work really well.
We will update in the next few days
Thank you
Alessandro
By PangOS | December 2nd, 2008 |
Hi, running Athlon64+ 3000, 2.5GB RAM. XP
Using my SATA HD for cache as it was giving read speeds 4x my Sandisk 4GB Card (SDR113 USB). About 40MB/sec. The card was only giving me 10MB/sec.
I noticed my cache fill % dropping and the read speeds getting real low. Now it’s under 10MB/sec, Cache fill is 15%. Do I have a problem?
By nikomiudon | |
hello.
Windows2000SP4+”kaspersky internet security7.0″
FireWall becomes malfunction.
An application filter and IDS do not function.
If it checks by a user interface, X [ red ] is attached to both sides.
thanks.
