Build 479 fix build cache bug in 473

By spectra9 | December 19th, 2008 |

WinXP Pro SP3, 1GB RAM with 2GB HD cache and 256 MB Flash cache

Retesting the same system which has problem building the cache in build 473, now everything works fine, build process went smoothly with multiple HD and Flash disk cache. Nice work guys :).

Some very minor cosmetic issue: after increasing the priority of an app in Cache Statistics and re-sorting the Weight column, the newly increased app isn’t sorted properly. Closing and reopening Cache Statistics solve the problem.

One suggestion, it would be nice to have a menu or button for Cache Statistics in the main eBooster Control Panel so we can launch it directly from there instead of fumbling through the Start menu

Building cache

By msilva | |

Hello,

Windows Vista Business sp1

2.33 ghz, 3.00 GB RAM

I downloaded the last version and I find that building cache takes a long time. Is it normal?

Why is that the random speed of the system memory never shows?

In my Windows XP Professional SP3

1.83 GHz, 3.00 GB RAM

Alocating the cache file is now slower them before.

Season’s greatings

Mario

Acer Aspire One/Vista and build 473…

By hans | |

With build 473 and Vista Ultimate 32bit, I could not have RAM and SDHC caching both running at the same time, meaning, if I attempted to add the SDHC card to build a cache on it, the eboostr service would simply stop altogether. Just the RAM caching however seems to work well and gets me better performance than with only Superfetch. Now I am using 473 and I have Superfetch disabled, and 512MB allocated to eboostr. I am off to download build 479 to see if the issue is resolved there. We shall see.

Acer Aspire One 9″ netbook – Atom N270 1.6GHz
1.5 GB RAM
Windows Vista Ultimate 32bit w/ SP1

AA1

By Mat | |

Fantastic! Running problem free on my Acer Aspire One with XP Home SP3, and big improvements even with a cheap generic brand 2GB memory stick – now off to buy an SD card and a faster memory stick!

Speed of light

By zPedro | |

My eBoostred Asus M50SV is still running at the speed of light! Meanwhile, I have a question I would like to be answered, if anybody could be so kind: shall we put in the eBoostr Exclude List the Vista ReadyBoost flashdrive? The speed is more or less the same as it is without excluding ReadyBoost SD memory card (Direct access speed: 17.183798 MB/s; Cache enabled access speed: 325.051636 MB/s; Ratio: 18.916170!!!!) It’s just a technical issue.

Thanks and once again congratulations for this wonderful software!

Build 479

By Andrey Zarudnev | |

Finally the new Beta build is available. This one may be named a “Release Candidate” because it is the last one that features new functionality. We are coming really close to holiday season and seem that our initial plans to release an official version 3 this year failed.

OK. We have to extend the Beta Test Program for an additional month and schedule the release date to January 15th 2009. In order to extend your Beta license, please use the following license data:

****BEGIN*LICENSE*KEY****
22DB16FC4FEDAD8EF232A061BFE1C835817CF067
A4258669C0B6591D216C22B05AFC536AE3250D9C
E4BDB8EB71ECE861600AF834C38ADC28885CA463
2BAA1560E585D54D45D272217103DC1894357899
BEB39713E459884A73F1176B858BB663273D9F66
D4678C727AF3D9D2BCA354C64FF210A76CC25318
F81D34F9660D095E*65424F4F53544552895D854
9895D8549679A4A4901000000000000000100010
00500050005000300CDCDCDCD420065007400610
0000042006500740061000000620065007400610
00000
****END*LICENSE*KEY****

 

What’s new in this version

  • RAM cache graduated loading to prevent boot time delays; new
  • Crash reporting functionality added to the product; new
  • Fixed missing tray icon;
  • An ability to place RAM cache on the needed partition removed by default (edit settings.ini to enable it);
  • Memory usage was optimized in the service; new
  • Context menu to assign priorities and quick exclude options were added in the cache and statistics viewers; new
  • Fixed several bugs in the driver.

Please note! This build features a new cache file format. You have to rebuild the cache after installing an upgrade.

[download#9#image]

No title

By many35 | |

Running on eeePC 1000H with 1GB cache ram + 2GB SD Card. Runs without problems for over a month now. Programs start faster especially 2nd time, however would like to see improvement in the first start of programs. Great software keep up the good work.

Anyone had the same experience?

By SC | December 18th, 2008 |

My pc configuration:

Laptop, Intel Core 2 Duo T7300 2GHz, 4 MB L2 cache, 4GB RAM, 64 bit OS, 5400 rpm hard drive, and I use a 133x speed SD card as the cache drive

I used 1024 MB system RAM plus 3072 MB of the SD card as cache drive

So far it’s worked very well with my laptop. I’ve tried different combination of cache drive and they all worked well. I guess the only comment I have so far (or more so a question I guess) is that when I’m using just ram as cache drive, the cache enabled read speed is so much faster than when I’m using both ram and SD card as cache drive, which I think it kind of make sense coz the access speed of RAM is much faster than SD card. My question is that: if I do use both at the same time, would it actually slow down the performance or would it not matter? Or should I used only RAM for best performance?

Perfect!

By soncarlosZ | |

Windows XP Professional SP3

Intel Celeron D CPU 3.33GHz

1,9 GB RAM

VIA/S3G UniChrome Pro IGP

TOSHIBA TransMemory USB Device (USB)

ReadyBoost

Size: 1906 MB

Direct access speed: 7.990681 MB/s

cache enabled access speed: 24.741638 MB/s

ratio: 3.096312

Allocated Size: 1911 MB

Cache fill: 100%

Random Read Speed 16954 KB/s

It Works PERFECT to me!

Thanks!

Tray icon

By postasat | |

The tray icon disappear from bar.

Windows XP 32

Athlon 3200+

3GB ram