By Ed | January 15th, 2009 |
Well, I suppose it’s far too soon to sing the praises of any new beta product, but over this last week I’ve had no problems! What I’m most impressed with is the Option to choose which application program has priority. I have several that I use most often such as Firefox, iTunes, VLC, Limewire and Media Player Classic. All these programs load astonishingly fast. Particularly VLC & Media Player Classic. I have a Sony Vaio VGN 290A laptop with 1 Gig of RAM and I operate with 150 applications, of which 30 I use regularly. Although I tweak my computer weekly by using TuneUp Utilities 2008 to remove useless files and keep the registry files in order, multitasking was sometimes a problem before I started using eboostr 2.2. I think the current version is okay, but again there was no system of choosing preferred applications so that they could load even faster. Another thing that I’ve noticed is the Speed Test has sped up tremendously….it used to take five to six minutes for this test, now it takes about 2. Wow! So far, I have not experienced any glitches. I’ll keep you posted, if this situation changes.
By Ed | |
Well, I suppose it’s far too soon to sing the praises of any new beta product, but over this last week I’ve had no problems! What I’m most impressed with is the Option to choose which application program has priority. I have several that I use most often such as Firefox, iTunes, VLC, Limewire and Media Player Classic. All these programs load astonishingly fast. Particularly VLC & Media Player Classic. I have a Sony Vaio VGN 290A laptop with 1 Gig of RAM and I operate with 150 applications, of which 30 I use regularly. Although I tweak my computer weekly by using TuneUp Utilities 2008 to remove useless files and keep the registry files in order, multitasking was sometimes a problem before I started using eboostr 2.2. I think the current version is okay, but again there was no system of choosing preferred applications so that they could load even faster. Another thing that I’ve notices is the Speed Test has sped up tremendously….it used to take five to six minutes for this test, now it takes about 2. Wow! So far, I have not experienced any glitches. I’ll keep you posted, if this situation changes.
By winroot | January 14th, 2009 |
OS: winxp sp3
Hardware: T7200 1.5G ram
when i install Eboostr v3 finished,reboot computer ,The control panel display “Driver is not loaded”
By skimark | |
With the latest beta on XP pro (all patches) the pc goes thru what seems to be normal shut down, but either doesn’t shut off power to itself, or on restart the next morning doesn’t actually start up. You have to press the power key to shut it down completely and then manually start up. I have the pc set to autostart every morning.
By Doug | |
I understand that exFAT overcomes the limitations of FAT32 more efficiently than NTFS, and is therefore preferable for flash devices. Does eBoostr support exFAT, or is exFAT support in the works?
By jsullivan | |
Diskeeper 2009 has a option for SSD (solid state drives) and when this option is enabled it seems to impact the performance of ebooster since usb drives are classified as SSD. Simply turning the option off rectified the slowdown.
By cc | January 13th, 2009 |
Not sure if anyone else has experienced this. I had been running beta 3 build 479 for less than a week on my Compaq Presario desktop – 1GB memory, Windows XP Professional SP3, 1GB Coby Electronics memory stick (new). All of a sudden, applications stopped working today(Internet Explorer, Outlook, etc.). The computer was constantly throwing errors in svchost.exe. After uninstalling eBoostr and rebooting, the problems stopped. It’s like the eBoostr cache was somehow becoming corrupted. Any ideas? Anything I can look at or tweak on my end?
By decrypt | |
In windows xp professional sp3, during cache rebuilding, if you start to use your computer (keyboard or mouse activity), the cache rebuilding stop.
In windows vista business, during cache rebuilding, even if there is keyboard or mouse activity, caching does not stop.
It seems that in windows vista, eboostr will rebuild cache even though there is keyboard or mouse activity.
By drkpheonix | |
I tried to create a cache on my 1 gig flash drive, but it said it had -2,000,000 mb of free space? It still let me create the cache though. Also, how can I get a beta key?
By V | |
Running eBoostr build 484 on a C2D 2.2GHz laptop w/ 4GB RAM and a 16GB USB flash drive (using the entire drive). eBoostr showed a cache fill of 18%. I rebuilt the cache files and it now shows 12% cache fill. Is this a bug? How do I get the program to build the cache file closer to 100% to make full use of the space on the flash device?
